Is Sarah Palin from the dark side?

Filed in Gather News Channel by on September 11, 2008 0 Comments

Deepak Chopra is someone whom I admire for many reasons, but his latest post on September 5th makes a very good case for Sarah Palin’s seeming popularity with some people.  He says the following:

“Sometimes politics has the uncanny effect of mirroring the national psyche even when nobody intended to do that. This is perfectly illustrated by the rousing effect that Gov. Sarah Palin had on the Republican convention in Minneapolis this week. On the surface, she outdoes former Vice President Dan Quayle as an unlikely choice, given her negligent parochial expertise in the complex affairs of governing. Her state of Alaska has less than 700,000 residents, which reduces the job of governor to the scale of running one-tenth of New York City. By comparison, Rudy Giuliani is a towering international figure. Palin’s pluck has been admired, and her forthrightness, but her real appeal goes deeper.

She is the reverse of Barack Obama, in essence his shadow, deriding his idealism and ex horting people to obey their worst impulses. In psychological terms the shadow is that part of the psyche that hides out of sight, countering our aspirations, virtue, and vision with qualities we are ashamed to face: anger, fear, revenge, violence, selfishness, and suspicion of ‘the other.’ For millions of Americans, Obama triggers those feelings, but they don’t want to express them. He is calling for us to reach for our higher selves, and frankly, that stirs up hidden reactions of an unsavory kind. (Just to be perfectly clear, I am not making a verbal play out of the fact that Sen. Obama is black. The shadow is a metaphor widely in use before his arrival on the scene.)

 I recognize that psychological analysis of politics is usually not welcome by the public, but I believe such a perspective can be helpful here to understand Palin’s message. In her acceptance speech Gov. Palin sent a rousing call to those who want to celebrate their resistance to change and a high er vision.

 Look at what she stands for:
 
 –Small town values — a denial of America’s global role, a return to petty, small-minded parochialism.
 
 –Ignorance of world affairs — a repudiation of the need to repair America’s image abroad.

 –Family values — a code for walling out anybody who makes a claim for social justice. Such strangers, being outside the family, don’t need to be heeded.
 
 –Rigid stands on guns and abortion — a scornful repudiation that these issues can be negotiated with those who disagree.

 –Patriotism — the usual fallback in a failed war.
 
 –‘Reform’ — an italicized term, since in addition to cleaning out corruption and excessive spending, one also throws out anyone who doesn’t fit your ideology.

 Palin reinforces the overall message of the reactionary right, which has been in play since 1980, that social justic e is liberal-radical, that minorities and immigrants, being different from ‘us’ pure American types, can be ignored, that progressivism takes too much effort and globalism is a foreign threat. The radical right marches under the banners of ‘I’m all right, Jack,’ and ‘Why change? Everything’s OK as it is.’ The irony, of course, is that Gov. Palin is a woman and a reactionary at the same time. She can add mom to apple pie on her resume, while blithely reversing forty years of feminist progress. The irony is superficial; there are millions of women who stand on the side of conservatism, however obviously they are voting against their own good. The Republicans have won multiple national elections by raising shadow issues based on fear, rejection, hostility to change, and narrow-mindedness.

 Obama’s call for higher ideals in politics can’t be seen in a vacuum. The shadow is real; it was bound to respond. Not just conservatives possess a shadow — we all do. So what com es next is a contest between the two forces of progress and inertia. Will the shadow win again, or has its furtive appeal become exhausted? No one can predict. The best thing about Gov. Palin is that she brought this conflict to light, which makes the upcoming debate honest. It would be a shame to elect another Reagan, whose smiling persona was a stalking horse for the reactionary forces that have brought us to the demoralized state we are in. We deserve to see what we are getting, without disguise.”

Here is a link to a Gloria Steinem article that has another original viewpoint:

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-steinem4-2008sep04,0,1290251.story

This is a serious election, my friends.  Perhaps many think I have lost my sense of humor, but the reality is that our current economic and political situation in this country – and its effect on the rest of the world – are in crisis.  If you fault me for this, I have no apologies to give you.

This is a cultural and class war and it is imperative that we all take this election seriously. 

About the Author ()

Sustainability blogger, community activist and an artist, I am passionate about what I believe and can be annoyingly cheerful and enthusiastic at times.

Leave a Reply